Kantian Ethics, Essay Example,Introduction
WebAug 10, · Kantian ethics is a deontological ethical theory first proposed by German philosopher Immanuel Kant. The theory, developed as a result of Enlightenment WebEthics is the conscious reflection on our moral beliefs targeting to improve, extend, or refine those beliefs in some way. Kantian moral and Utilitarianism theories attempt to WebNov 28, · Immanuel Kant, a German philosopher, calls the principles Categorical Imperatives, which are defined by their morality and level of freedom. Who was Web“Kant’s theory is an example of a deontological moral theory–according to these theories, the rightness or wrongness of actions does not depend on their consequences but on WebEthics is the conscious reflection on our moral beliefs targeting to improve, extend, or refine those beliefs in some way. Kantian moral and Utilitarianism theories attempt to respond ... read more
Likewise, if the motivation is not morally right, then a person is not morally worth. Actions are dependent on something else; they sprout from something else; that is motivation, therefore, actions cannot make someone morally worth or unworthy. To expound the issue of motivation, Kant considers an individual who has won a lottery and decides to give all his fortunes to charity work to feel good about it. Kant posits that, this individual is not morally worthy because the motivation was not out of duty but a selfish quest. To Kant, consequences are insignificant because without motivation, there would be no consequences. Moreover, one may have the wrong motivation and get right or good results. For instance, if two drunken people drive recklessly and unfortunately, one of them runs over a pedestrian while the other does not, they are both morally unworthy because the motivation behind their actions was wrong.
Unfortunately, people interpret morality wrongly. Supposing the man who won the lottery gives the money with the right motivation of helping destitute children; unfortunately, a gang realizes that the children have food; raid the place killing all the children and making away with all food. In such a case, the man who gave the money is morally worthy because his intentions were right. This argument renders consequences void and they cannot be used as parameters of gauging morality. In contrast to what many critics think, Kant does not veto felicity. One can do something to be happy as long as it is moral.
In the light of this argument, all people would become liars hence robbing people of trust. Therefore, people should never lie, in principle. Taking Kant to be true, a person would rather let his or her friend die even if lying would save the situation. This maxim becomes inconsequential because even killing would be allowed as long as the motive is right like self-defense. Kant cannot justify this fact. Kantian ethics are complicated given the maxims that he employs to explain his imperatives. Kant believes that people cannot be morally worthy by their actions. To explain this he uses two forms of imperatives viz. conditional and categorical. Need a custom Essay sample written from scratch by professional specifically for you?
Immanuel Kant Ethics. Table of Contents. Introduction The Ethics Conclusion Works Cited. Learn More. We will write a custom Essay on Immanuel Kant Ethics specifically for you! In some situations, a person may want to take out a loan and would be able to pay the money back and so they may not be able to because of universal moral laws that have been put in place which say that this is wrong. Just like the person who will take out a loan even though they know that they will not be able to pay the money back. Overall, I think that Kantian ethics are helpful for moral decision-making in some contexts because it is so clear that a child could understand what they should and should not do.
This means that no one can act in a selfish way and so would promote a happier environment. This paragraph has some good analytical and evaluative points mixed in. however, the paragraph is still rather long. This means that the theory provides the foundations for modern conceptions of equality and justice and suggests that no one can be used for being a different race, culture or religion. It also suggests that everyone is of equal worth and that no one is of a higher value of another individual. This as a result would reduce the chances of social unsettlement and minimise the amount of prejudice that is happening in the modern day. However, this is not always the case. This therefore means that an unrealistically high standard is set which some people are not adhering to which was always going to be the case otherwise there would be no need for moral laws to be put in place.
To conclude this, I still think that Kantian ethics is helpful for some moral decision-making but not in every kind of context. My reason for this I because not everyone makes moral decisions and it cannot be universalised because the rules are not universal in all situations and so it is unrealistic. Plenty of good material here showing signs of the potential to be a top grade candidate. Underlying this there is an acute mind, however, and I particularly like the way different points are grounded in practical examples. An exciting prospect! A very good demonstration of knowledge and understanding in response to the question:.
A very good demonstration of analysis and evaluation in response to the question:. Assessment of Extended Response: There is a well—developed and sustained line of reasoning which is coherent, relevant and logically structured work on this a bit more. This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed. Home Digital Resources Blog Visit Peped. Essay: Kantian ethics are helpful for moral decision-making. by peter.
On one hand, I do not think that Kantian ethics is helpful with every decision. This is because all situations are different and are not the same so it cannot be universal. His theology also was based on the idea of Maxims. Maxims are moral rules that are determined by reason. He believed that everyone has reason and so if we all had reason then this makes us all the same, meaning that we all should be making the same moral decisions. For example, the situation with the man and the axe. There are never two situations that are the same. Therefore, the theory should be relativist and not absolutist. Then spell out the three reasons in a subsequent paragraph structure. On the counter side, Kantian ethics is reliable in some circumstances.
It relies on a system of rules which is very clear cut, meaning that everyone is aware of the obligations. Yes, but you need to show me how Kant produces the rule in the first place! By a priori reason. If you allowed everyone to break the rules, then the consequences of the legal system would be a mess. No one would know what they ought to do. For example, in order for everyone to do their duty, it must be able to be universalised. if you promise to take a loan of money out with the intention that you will not be able to pay the company back in the time that has been given, the promise contradicts the act of keeping a promise. Yes, technically he calls this a perfect duty because it is logically contradictory to break the rule of promising Kant would view this as it being morally wrong to make a lying promise and so would advise people not to take a loan out because one may not be able to guarantee that they can pay the company that leant the money back.
It should be able to break an unhelpful rule if the individual circumstances mean that that is the right thing to do. For example, going back to talking about the example with making a lying promise. In some situations, a person may want to take out a loan and would be able to pay the money back and so they may not be able to because of universal moral laws that have been put in place which say that this is wrong. Just like the person who will take out a loan even though they know that they will not be able to pay the money back. Overall, I think that Kantian ethics are helpful for moral decision-making in some contexts because it is so clear that a child could understand what they should and should not do.
This means that no one can act in a selfish way and so would promote a happier environment. This paragraph has some good analytical and evaluative points mixed in. however, the paragraph is still rather long. This means that the theory provides the foundations for modern conceptions of equality and justice and suggests that no one can be used for being a different race, culture or religion. It also suggests that everyone is of equal worth and that no one is of a higher value of another individual. This as a result would reduce the chances of social unsettlement and minimise the amount of prejudice that is happening in the modern day.
However, this is not always the case. This therefore means that an unrealistically high standard is set which some people are not adhering to which was always going to be the case otherwise there would be no need for moral laws to be put in place. To conclude this, I still think that Kantian ethics is helpful for some moral decision-making but not in every kind of context. My reason for this I because not everyone makes moral decisions and it cannot be universalised because the rules are not universal in all situations and so it is unrealistic. Plenty of good material here showing signs of the potential to be a top grade candidate. Underlying this there is an acute mind, however, and I particularly like the way different points are grounded in practical examples.
An exciting prospect! A very good demonstration of knowledge and understanding in response to the question:. A very good demonstration of analysis and evaluation in response to the question:. Assessment of Extended Response: There is a well—developed and sustained line of reasoning which is coherent, relevant and logically structured work on this a bit more. This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed. Home Digital Resources Blog Visit Peped. Essay: Kantian ethics are helpful for moral decision-making.
by peter. Study with us. Practise Questions Religious Studies Guides — Check out our great books in the Shop.
Kantian Ethics Essays,Kantian Ethics Essay
WebNov 28, · Immanuel Kant, a German philosopher, calls the principles Categorical Imperatives, which are defined by their morality and level of freedom. Who was WebAug 10, · Kantian ethics is a deontological ethical theory first proposed by German philosopher Immanuel Kant. The theory, developed as a result of Enlightenment WebEthics is the conscious reflection on our moral beliefs targeting to improve, extend, or refine those beliefs in some way. Kantian moral and Utilitarianism theories attempt to respond WebEthics is the conscious reflection on our moral beliefs targeting to improve, extend, or refine those beliefs in some way. Kantian moral and Utilitarianism theories attempt to WebAug 18, · Kantian Ethics Essay. Kantian ethics functions as the most feasible especially in the definition of individual duty in ethical situations. Kant’s ideas are WebKant lived in remote province where he was born for his entire life. He was the fourth of nine children but the oldest surviving child to obtain an education. His parents were devoted ... read more
Pages: 3 Words: Essay. On the other hand, even though Lisa is a young girl, no one is depending on her for survival. Therefore, moral aspects must be defined by the categorical imperatives for the basic reasoning that people are commanded by morality and they cannot choose to take it or leave it; they have to abide to its requirements. Other philosophers have argued that Kant's parents and his teacher, Martin Knutzen, influenced his ethics. For example, in order for everyone to do their duty, it must be able to be universalised.
In the following pages, kantian ethics essay, I will attempt to present and discuss the theories of Kant and Mill, pointing out what I perceive as weakness in said theories, as well as the possible strengths of each system. Call Now! In some situations, a person may want to take out a loan and would be able to pay the money back and so they may not be able to because of universal moral laws that have been put in place which say that this is wrong. At this point in time, it appears that Jerry has the most to contribute to society as well. Exceptions exist but their strengths are diminished when individuals focus on actual situations, their expectations and how people handle them. Emotion seems like it should be considered in decision making, kantian ethics essay, since there can be such strong sensations associated with kantian ethics essay decisions.
No comments:
Post a Comment