Political Philosophy Essay,Find Free Essays
WebPolitical Philosophy Essay. Better Essays. Words. 8 Pages. Open Document. Political Philosophy. Part One (Question 2) Aristotle, Locke, and Hobbes all place a WebFeb 2, · Example Of Political Philosophy Essay. Type of paper: Essay. Topic: Philosophy, Government, Politics, Economics, Development, Elections, Democracy, WebEssay Examples Political Philosophy and Individualism. Plato’s Theory of Political Philosophy; An Argumen. His father was Ariston who was believed to have connection WebJul 13, · While it is true that philosophy may be considered to be eternally evolving, perhaps in keeping with the very evolution of human kind, the fact is that the study of WebJan 15, · This is just a sample. You can get your custom paper by one of our expert writers. Get custom essay. writers online. Anarchy is the condition of a society, ... read more
Maryland, 4 Wheat , The reasons given by the Court is that the establishment of the bank is not among the limitations on those powers and its terms purport to enlarge and not to diminish the powers vested in the government McCulloch v. As explained by Justice Marshall, it was an additional power not a restriction on those already granted McCulloch v. Furthermore, in declaring the tax imposed as unconstitutional, Justice Marshall explained that said tax imposed on the operations of the bank and is consequently a tax on the operation of an instrument of the Union to carry its powers into execution and hence unconstitutional granted McCulloch v. In the Gibbons v. It ruled that the power to regulate like all others vested in congress is complete in itself and may be exercised to its utmost extent and acknowledges no limitations other than are prescribed in the constitution Gibbons v.
Ogden, 9 Wheaton 1, Conclusion In these, it can be seen that the power of judiciary or their power of judicial review is indeed one of those which may be considered as an expansion of federal government, giving such power to determine whether or not the action of a branch of the government is in accordance with the Constitution or the laws of the land. This power was then feared by Jefferson mainly because of the scope of influence it has in the operations of the entire federal government which may somehow impose upon states.
On the otherhand, Hamilton would certainly favor this expansionist central authority in order to establish a stronger national government which he believed would lead to the development of the nation. Because of this power, judicial review must then endeavor to balance federalism with the states power and strive hard to make decisions which would entirely benefit the federal government as a whole. Parber, Daniel, William Eskridge, Jr. and Philip Frickey. Minnesota: West Publishing Co. Feeley, Malcolm and Samuel Krislov. Constitutional Law, 2nd Edition. Illinois: Scott, Foresman and Company, Gibbons v. Ogden, 9 Wheaton 1 Marbury v. Madison, 1 Cranch McCulloch v. Maryland, 4 Wheat Skidmore, Max. American Political Thought. New York: St. Skip to content Home Free Essays Political Philosophy essay.
Machiavelli's themes on the use of power by individuals and institutions are even used to study the complexities of Shakespeare. Ultimately, Machiavelli argues that in terms of power, the end justifies the means. Socrates operates under a much different premise when compared to that of Machiavellian. Instead of assuming the inherent cruelty of some men, this doctrine preaches the importance of questioning why those that have power are able to morally have authority over others. The major doctrine comes from questioning the reasoning and rationale for any and all of the actions of those in power. That being said, Socratic methods are usually a means of carefully justifying through inquiry actions that are morally permissible for all parties involved.
The major rationale for discussing Machiavellen principles grows from this ideology, which allows for swift, efficient action in any given situation. Socratic gadfly is an excellent means for making sure that every possible action is justified in that it can reduce all actions to a series of questions and, subsequently, ask if those carrying out said actions are justified and morally permissible in doing so. But, the downside to such a thorough course of action is that it can slow down any real action to a crawl and a major debate that can ultimately end in a stalemate.
A political issue or event can be quickly resolved because by the Machiavellian principle, one needs to simply arrive by whatever means possible to the optimal solution. The major issue that derives from this principle is in that of the people that have power under such a system. The major drawback and argument against adopting a Machiavellian system of political ideology, more fully discussed in the essay on Machiavelli's The Prince, is that those in power will misuse it for their own personal benefits while oppressing and harming those with no power in the process. However, if one makes this argument than they must also be opened to the possibility that the system can allow for a truly benevolent individual to take control of a political system and, with the ability to act decisively, can make swift, just, and fair actions to lead a group or state.
When examining how it seems that most entities operate in the world today, it seems evident that the vast majority of political groups operate under a very Machiavellian system. The UN practices a carefully executed, debated approach before taking any action, and as a result, many feel this organization is relatively weak and powerless in terms of being able to take action and get the political process moving. On the other hand, when the President of the United States makes an executive order, immediate action is taken. This is usually in response to an impending issue or concern that needs immediate action.
Though the action can sometimes lead to the harm of a few, the country tends to follow a idea of justifying their actions by the results. Being that I am a person that wants to be able to make swift, decisive actions, I identify with the Machiavellian school of thought. Thomas Hobbes is an early American political thought leader and as one of the most influential minds in terms of political philosophy and will, most likely, remain so for centuries to come. His work Leviathan has been called one of the most significant pieces of writing in modern political ideology, rivaling the works of many famous minds including Plato, Aristotle, Locke, and many others.
Hobbes believes that humanity is in need of a strong, central authority in order to be kept in control and not descend into a state of chaos and political upheaval. Leviathan is a way in which Hobbes furthers his ideas as laid down by his social contract theory. The Leviathan is a metaphor for the figurehead that would rule the commonwealth that Hobbes suggests and also can be seen in relation to the monster of the seas of both folklore and biblical references. In the text, Hobbes makes the general statement that when reduced to the most principle features of nature mankind is inherently both violent and full of fear driven actions.
In this state, mankind is constantly trying to destroy one another in the hopes of gaining others resources and other material possessions while maintaining their own safety. To combat this state of pure fear and fighting, Hobbes speculates that man will want to find peace and in doing so move to this state by following the principles that he has laid out in his social contract. Hobbes' views on selfish morality means that he believes humans are inherently not good. This is not to say that mankind is purely evil, but Hobbes seems to operate under the notion that mankind will not be unwilling to hinder others for his own personal gain.
Based on this logic, Hobbes calls for a form of government where an unbiased opinion is the one in charge of a particular society. In this sense, Hobbes' shares a scholarly interest in aspects of morality that have also been studied and explained by Descartes and Descartesian morality. Yet, Hobbes hoped to establish an authority of absolute power that will act in such a way as to better the society as a whole. Those that are governed by this system will want to follow it. Hobbes is quoted as saying that man will define morality in such a way that it will only preserve those persons own self-interests.
By putting a person that is supposedly removed from that society, Hobbes feels they will be able to not pass judgments that are biased to their own self-interests. Unfortunately, if Hobbes truly believes that this is the way in which humankind will act when left to his own vices, the Leviathan of this society will eventually act in such a way that will benefit his or her self interests to some extent. Perhaps this sort of government would, theoretically, be possible in the time that Hobbes originally wrote Leviathan, however such a system could not be possible today.
In modern society, the world is so interconnected that someone with such absolute power would clearly make decisions for a group that would have repercussions felt by that individual. Hobbes operates under the simple premise that mankind will do only what is in their own interests when left alone. This pessimistic view on society lead Hobbes to create the social contract theory that subsequently lead to the underlying ideology of Leviathan. The advancement of technology has made the repercussions of all nations actions interwoven so that we are now entering a time of global dependency and awareness.
Hobbes, Thomas, and J. Oxford: Oxford University Press, Machiavelli, Niccolò, Thomas More, Martin Luther, William Roper, Ninian Hill Thomson, Ralph Robinson, Robert Scarlett Grignon, and C. The Prince. New York: P. Ultius, Inc. Ultius Blog, 14 Jan. Click here for more help with MLA citations. Sample Essay on Political Philosophy. Click here for more help with APA citations. January 14, Click here for more help with CMS citations. Click here for more help with Turabian citations.
Political philosophy is a subfield of philosophy that focuses heavily on the political, legal, and moral implications of different schools of thought within society. It is a field that goes back thousands of years to the time of Socrates, and more recently Machiavelli and Hobbes. These topics are covered below, or consider Ultius' other topics within the humanties and philosophy for additional information. Over time, a number of philosphers have tried to delineate the inter-related areas of morailty, justice, and the place of indiviudals within society. This essay will focus on Machiavelli's concepts of power, Socrates' emphasis on justice, and Thomas Hobbes' exploration of central political authority through his publication Leviathan , as well as Hobbes' understanding of selfish morality.
When choosing between identifying with either the Socratic school of thought or a Machiavellian Prince, it is important to answer the question of how important power is to the individual. From a personal standpoint, I must admit that I identify with the Machiavellian point of view and therefore would rather be a Machiavellian Prince instead of a Socratic gadfly, which is a person that acts as a stimulating and provocative, though negative, agent of change. Instead of acting under the premise that humans are inherently good and moral, and therefore achieves gains through good, Machiavellian has a more pessimistic attitude to human nature.
In the present day, there is greater acceptance of the idea of changing moral judgements , instead of one set of rules, for a number of philosophers and writers. Machiavelli though, focuses not on morality, but on power. He pushes for the notion of the preservation of power by those that obtain it. Machiavellian points out,. Machiavelli's themes on the use of power by individuals and institutions are even used to study the complexities of Shakespeare. Ultimately, Machiavelli argues that in terms of power, the end justifies the means. Socrates operates under a much different premise when compared to that of Machiavellian.
Instead of assuming the inherent cruelty of some men, this doctrine preaches the importance of questioning why those that have power are able to morally have authority over others. The major doctrine comes from questioning the reasoning and rationale for any and all of the actions of those in power. That being said, Socratic methods are usually a means of carefully justifying through inquiry actions that are morally permissible for all parties involved. The major rationale for discussing Machiavellen principles grows from this ideology, which allows for swift, efficient action in any given situation. Socratic gadfly is an excellent means for making sure that every possible action is justified in that it can reduce all actions to a series of questions and, subsequently, ask if those carrying out said actions are justified and morally permissible in doing so.
But, the downside to such a thorough course of action is that it can slow down any real action to a crawl and a major debate that can ultimately end in a stalemate. A political issue or event can be quickly resolved because by the Machiavellian principle, one needs to simply arrive by whatever means possible to the optimal solution. The major issue that derives from this principle is in that of the people that have power under such a system. The major drawback and argument against adopting a Machiavellian system of political ideology, more fully discussed in the essay on Machiavelli's The Prince, is that those in power will misuse it for their own personal benefits while oppressing and harming those with no power in the process.
However, if one makes this argument than they must also be opened to the possibility that the system can allow for a truly benevolent individual to take control of a political system and, with the ability to act decisively, can make swift, just, and fair actions to lead a group or state. When examining how it seems that most entities operate in the world today, it seems evident that the vast majority of political groups operate under a very Machiavellian system. The UN practices a carefully executed, debated approach before taking any action, and as a result, many feel this organization is relatively weak and powerless in terms of being able to take action and get the political process moving.
On the other hand, when the President of the United States makes an executive order, immediate action is taken. This is usually in response to an impending issue or concern that needs immediate action. Though the action can sometimes lead to the harm of a few, the country tends to follow a idea of justifying their actions by the results. Being that I am a person that wants to be able to make swift, decisive actions, I identify with the Machiavellian school of thought. Thomas Hobbes is an early American political thought leader and as one of the most influential minds in terms of political philosophy and will, most likely, remain so for centuries to come.
His work Leviathan has been called one of the most significant pieces of writing in modern political ideology, rivaling the works of many famous minds including Plato, Aristotle, Locke, and many others. Hobbes believes that humanity is in need of a strong, central authority in order to be kept in control and not descend into a state of chaos and political upheaval. Leviathan is a way in which Hobbes furthers his ideas as laid down by his social contract theory. The Leviathan is a metaphor for the figurehead that would rule the commonwealth that Hobbes suggests and also can be seen in relation to the monster of the seas of both folklore and biblical references. In the text, Hobbes makes the general statement that when reduced to the most principle features of nature mankind is inherently both violent and full of fear driven actions.
In this state, mankind is constantly trying to destroy one another in the hopes of gaining others resources and other material possessions while maintaining their own safety. To combat this state of pure fear and fighting, Hobbes speculates that man will want to find peace and in doing so move to this state by following the principles that he has laid out in his social contract. Hobbes' views on selfish morality means that he believes humans are inherently not good. This is not to say that mankind is purely evil, but Hobbes seems to operate under the notion that mankind will not be unwilling to hinder others for his own personal gain.
Based on this logic, Hobbes calls for a form of government where an unbiased opinion is the one in charge of a particular society. In this sense, Hobbes' shares a scholarly interest in aspects of morality that have also been studied and explained by Descartes and Descartesian morality. Yet, Hobbes hoped to establish an authority of absolute power that will act in such a way as to better the society as a whole. Those that are governed by this system will want to follow it. Hobbes is quoted as saying that man will define morality in such a way that it will only preserve those persons own self-interests.
By putting a person that is supposedly removed from that society, Hobbes feels they will be able to not pass judgments that are biased to their own self-interests. Unfortunately, if Hobbes truly believes that this is the way in which humankind will act when left to his own vices, the Leviathan of this society will eventually act in such a way that will benefit his or her self interests to some extent. Perhaps this sort of government would, theoretically, be possible in the time that Hobbes originally wrote Leviathan, however such a system could not be possible today. In modern society, the world is so interconnected that someone with such absolute power would clearly make decisions for a group that would have repercussions felt by that individual. Hobbes operates under the simple premise that mankind will do only what is in their own interests when left alone.
This pessimistic view on society lead Hobbes to create the social contract theory that subsequently lead to the underlying ideology of Leviathan. The advancement of technology has made the repercussions of all nations actions interwoven so that we are now entering a time of global dependency and awareness. Hobbes, Thomas, and J. Oxford: Oxford University Press, Machiavelli, Niccolò, Thomas More, Martin Luther, William Roper, Ninian Hill Thomson, Ralph Robinson, Robert Scarlett Grignon, and C. The Prince. New York: P. Ultius, Inc. Ultius Blog, 14 Jan.
Click here for more help with MLA citations. Sample Essay on Political Philosophy. Click here for more help with APA citations. January 14, Click here for more help with CMS citations. Click here for more help with Turabian citations. Ultius is the trusted provider of content solutions and matches customers with highly qualified writers for sample writing, academic editing, and business writing. Ultius is the trusted provider of content solutions for consumers around the world. You read that right —We're giving away free scholarship money! Our next drawing will be held soon. Apply today for your chance to win! Claim Offer.
Made in USA Live Chat Chat with us. More options ALISA Chatbot Messenger Live Chat specialist. Writing Editing Get your existing paper edited improved by a seasoned professional. See services Business Business document preparation services for helping you get a job. See services Admissions New Get into your dream school with a personalized application essay. See services. Custom writing from scratch. Completely original—just for you. College essay Research paper Capstone project Dissertation Thesis More services. More info Learn more about us Blog Future writers Explore further. Essay Writing Samples. Sample Essay on Political Philosophy Ultius.
Select network. html Copy. MLA Style APA Style Chicago Style Turabian. Copied to clipboard Click here for more help with MLA citations. Copied to clipboard Click here for more help with APA citations. Copied to clipboard Click here for more help with CMS citations. Copied to clipboard Click here for more help with Turabian citations. Rate this blog entry:. Tags Hobbes individual and society Machiavelli political philosopher Hobbes Socrates Socrates and injustice Socrates and morality the social contract. Author Ultius. View author's profile Show more posts from author. Tested Daily Click to Verify. About The Author This post was written by Ultius.
Navigation Writer Options How it Works Pricing Samples. Services Custom Writing Editing Business Documents.
Political Philosophy Essays (Examples),Popular Topics in Category
WebJan 15, · This is just a sample. You can get your custom paper by one of our expert writers. Get custom essay. writers online. Anarchy is the condition of a society, WebPolitical Philosophy essay. Alexander Hamilton, the conservative Secretary of the Treasury and Thomas Jefferson who was the Secretary of State, were two of the popular WebPolitical Philosophy Essay. Better Essays. Words. 8 Pages. Open Document. Political Philosophy. Part One (Question 2) Aristotle, Locke, and Hobbes all place a WebFeb 2, · Example Of Political Philosophy Essay. Type of paper: Essay. Topic: Philosophy, Government, Politics, Economics, Development, Elections, Democracy, WebJul 13, · While it is true that philosophy may be considered to be eternally evolving, perhaps in keeping with the very evolution of human kind, the fact is that the study of WebEssay Examples Political Philosophy and Individualism. Plato’s Theory of Political Philosophy; An Argumen. His father was Ariston who was believed to have connection ... read more
Kinzie, Susan. are under attack by the Republicans in the House of Representatives. The Cultural Revolution and post Mao reforms: a historical perspective. Explain what nature means for a Greek Plato b Catholic Christian Augustin, Aquinas - A Protestant Christian Luther, Calvin. Plato's doctrine of recollection holds that learning is the remembering of a wisdom that the soul enjoyed prior to its incarnation, another aspect of the idea that there are ideal forms "remembered" by the soul in this world, and this is actually a mythical statement of this view that neither reason nor the intelligible order that it reveals is alien to the human soul. Political violence is like a festering wound, in that, without the aid of antibiotics the wound has the potential to depress the immune system and eventually overwhelm the individual, leading to death.
We can write you a custom essay that will follow your exact instructions and meet the deadlines. There was concern that those political philosophy essay would be very much at risk in a post hand over environment. You a philosopher's ideas directly influenced a leader Machiavelli's influence Mussolini Hitler. Philosophers John Rawls and Hannah Arendt each establish different definitions of freedom that help to judge the legitimacy and purpose of political institutions, political philosophy essay. Marx, Karl, Friedrich Engels, and L. A century and a half later, Karl Marx espoused… Works Cited Locke, John, and Peter Laslett ed.
No comments:
Post a Comment